Are you from the public sector?
Are you from the public sector?
Test the complete functionality of AccessGO risk-free for 7 days free of charge.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act (BFSG) is a central regulatory framework for digital accessibility in Germany. It obligates private companies and providers of digital products to design their websites, mobile applications, and various digital services accessibly. Consequently, the law particularly affects e-commerce platforms, online banking, ticketing services, e-books, and numerous other digital offerings.
The statutory requirements encompass clear specifications for the design and usability of digital content, while also defining exemptions and deadlines for implementation. Companies face the task of understanding the structure of the BFSG, identifying their own obligations, and managing the practical implementation efficiently. Compliance with the Accessibility Strengthening Act is therefore an important step toward making digital offerings accessible to all users and meeting legal requirements.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act (BFSG) is structured into several sections that systematically regulate digital accessibility requirements for private providers. The text of the law first defines central terms, describes the scope of application, and establishes the specific obligations for companies. This structure is supplemented by regulations on monitoring, enforcement, and potential exemptions. The accompanying ordinances specify the technical and functional requirements, such as those for websites and mobile applications.
The BFSG is part of the transposition of the European Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act. It supplements existing national regulations such as the BITV 2.0, but is explicitly directed at private providers of digital products and services. This distinguishes it from previous laws, which primarily applied to public sector bodies. The target audiences of the BFSG are, in particular, companies that provide digital products, websites, or services for consumers.
| Structural element | Content and meaning |
|---|---|
| Legal text | Definitions, scope, obligations, monitoring, exceptions |
| Regulations | Specific technical and functional requirements for digital offerings |
| European context | Implementation of EU Directive (EU) 2019/882 – European Accessibility Act |
| Distinction from other laws | Focus on private providers, supplement to BITV 2.0 and other accessibility-related laws |
The Accessibility Strengthening Act aims to make digital services accessible to everyone—regardless of individual impairments. At its core are the guiding principles of equal opportunity, inclusion, and equal participation in social life.The law obligates providers of digital products and services to dismantle barriers, thereby facilitating use for people with disabilities as well as for older individuals.
For consumers, the BFSG means improved access to digital information and services, which promotes self-determined participation in many areas of life. The law motivates companies and providers to design their digital offerings to be more user-friendly, thereby reaching a broader target audience. The objective of the BFSG is thus directly related to the societal demand to establish digital accessibility as a fundamental prerequisite for inclusion.
7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act defines specific success criteria against which the digital accessibility of websites and digital products is evaluated. The authoritative baselines are technical standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1 AA) and the European standard EN 301 549. These standards dictate which requirements digital offerings must fulfill to be considered accessible. The criteria encompass, among other things, the perceivability, operability, understandability, and robustness of content.
The evaluation system of the BFSG is based on internationally recognized benchmarks, yet it differs from other models through its explicit anchoring in German law and its binding implementation for private providers. While other assessment models are frequently based on voluntary self-commitments, the success criteria of the BFSG are mandatory and are monitored by state authorities.
| Success criterion | Significance in the BFSG context |
|---|---|
| WCAG 2.1 AA | Minimum technical standard for accessible websites and digital products |
| EN 301 549 | European standard for specifying accessibility requirements for ICT products and services |
| Mandatory implementation | Success criteria are legally binding for private providers |
| Difference from voluntary models | BFSG mandates compliance with the criteria; it is not a mere self-commitment |
The verification of compliance with the Accessibility Strengthening Act is carried out by specially designated market surveillance authorities. These agencies are authorized to audit digital offerings for accessibility on a random-sample or incident-driven basis. As part of the audit, they evaluate whether the statutory requirements have been implemented and whether the providers are fulfilling their documentation and verification obligations. Companies must present the appropriate evidence and document the implementation of the success criteria in a verifiable manner.
Audits can be conducted both internally and externally, but they face legally defined boundaries. While internal audits serve the purpose of self-monitoring, external reviews by market surveillance authorities carry binding authority. The possibilities of auditing are determined by statutory requirements and technical standards. Limitations arise in particular when evaluating complex or dynamic content, as not all aspects can be verified automatically or without user involvement.
| Type of audit | Characteristics and responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Internal audits | Self-monitoring by the company, voluntary and non-binding, serves as preparation for external audits |
| External audits | Conducted by market surveillance authorities, legally required, binding evaluation and possible orders |
| Documentation obligation | Companies must provide evidence of accessibility implementation |
| Limits of auditability | Automated checks are limited; complex content requires additional manual reviews |
For companies, the practical implementation of the Accessibility Strengthening Act means systematically reviewing and adapting existing digital offerings. The process begins with an inventory assessment, followed by an analysis of the gaps regarding the statutory requirements. Subsequently, targeted measures are planned and integrated into the digital development and operational processes. In this context, it is crucial to incorporate the relevant technical standards, such as WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549, into the development process from the very outset.
Integration into existing processes is best achieved through interdisciplinary collaboration, such as between IT, design,and legal departments. Practical examples demonstrate that early integration of accessibility requirements leads to sustainable results for both websites and digital products like apps or e-books. Automated testing, manual reviews, and continuous documentation are essential components of a successful implementation process.
| Implementation step | Practical relevance / Example |
|---|---|
| Inventory & Analysis | Audit of an existing website for accessibility gaps |
| Planning & Integration | Incorporating accessibility requirements into the development process of an app |
| Technical standards | WCAG 2.1 AA criteria as the basis for user interface design |
| Testing & Documentation | Combination of automated checks and manual tests, ongoing creation of evidence |
Schedule a free consultation and speak with one of our experts.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act is closely linked to European and national regulations on digital accessibility. It implements the mandates of the European Accessibility Act (EAA) for private providers, thereby supplementing existing national laws such as the BITV 2.0, which primarily applies to public sector bodies. While the technical requirements are aligned with international standards like the WCAG, the BFSG makes them legally binding for the private sector. This establishes a clear distinction between the obligations of private and public providers.
Industry-specific regulations, such as those in the healthcare or financial sectors, remain unaffected by the BFSG provided that they impose stricter requirements. For companies, this means they must adapt their compliance processes and take into account both the BFSG and further industry-specific or international mandates. The regulatory categorization of the BFSG thus has a direct impact on the design of internal processes and requires careful alignment with existing frameworks.
In practice, companies face various challenges when implementing the Accessibility Strengthening Act. Among the most frequent issues are a lack of internal ownership, unclear responsibilities, and a deficit of expertise in the field of digital accessibility. Technical stumbling blocks often arise when integrating accessibility requirements into legacy systems,particularly if these were not taken into account from the very beginning. Furthermore, the selection and deployment of suitable testing tools are also frequently underestimated.
Another problem area stems from misinterpretations of the statutory requirements. For instance, companies often implement individual WCAG criteria without adopting a holistic approach, or they neglect continuous documentation. Furthermore, practical examples demonstrate that barriers are frequently overlooked, particularly in complex web applications and dynamic content. Project experience highlights that early, interdisciplinary planning and regular reviews are crucial to avoiding these typical sources of error.
| Challenge | Practical example / Source of error |
|---|---|
| Unclear responsibilities | No designated specialist department for digital accessibility within the company |
| Technical integration | Accessibility only retrofitted into existing systems |
| Misinterpretation of requirements | Only individual criteria are implemented; the overall approach is missing |
| Insufficient testing | Automated checks without supplementary manual tests lead to gaps |
The Accessibility Strengthening Act provides for certain exemptions and special regulations that specifically limit its scope of application. Micro-enterprises with fewer than ten employees and an annual turnover or annual balance sheet total of no more than two million euros are particularly exempt from most obligations. Furthermore, individual sectors or products can also be exempted if implementation would impose a disproportionate burden, or if compelling technical or economic reasons exist.
The assessment of whether an exemption applies is based on clearly defined criteria within the law. These include, among other things, financial capacity, the effort required for implementation, and proportionality on a case-by-case basis. While these exemptions largely release the affected companies from general digital accessibility obligations, no special regulations apply to larger corporations and core digital services.
| Exception/Special regulation | Criterion and impact |
|---|---|
| Micro-enterprises | Fewer than 10 employees and under 2 million euros annual turnover/balance sheet total – largely exempt from BFSG obligations |
| Disproportionate burden | Demonstrably unreasonable effort or economic overstrain can lead to an exception |
| Industry-specific exceptions | Certain products or services for which technical implementation is not possible |
| Distinction from general obligations | Exceptions do not apply to larger companies or central digital offerings |
7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.
The implementation of the Accessibility Strengthening Act is tied to clearly defined deadlines and transitional periods.For most digital products and services provided by private entities, June 28, 2025, serves as the central deadline: from this date onward, new digital offerings must meet the requirements of the BFSG. For already existing offerings, longer transitional periods apply in part, ensuring that companies have sufficient time for adaptation. This staggered timeline enables technical and organizational measures to be implemented in phases.
Compliance with the deadlines is of great importance for companies, as failures to meet them can trigger enforcement measures by market surveillance authorities. This can result in regulatory orders or further consequences. It is therefore highly advisable to begin planning and implementation early to fulfill all requirements in a timely manner and to have verification documentation readily available.
| Deadline/Date | Significance for digital offerings |
|---|---|
| June 28, 2025 | New developments must be BFSG-compliant from this date |
| Transition periods for existing offerings | Existing digital products and websites receive longer adjustment periods |
| Failure to meet deadlines | Market surveillance authorities can order measures; proof of implementation required |
| Step-by-step implementation | Companies can stagger measures but must meet all deadlines |
The Accessibility Improvement Act covers digital products and services such as websites, mobile applications, e-commerce platforms, online banking, ticket and booking systems, e-books, self-service terminals, and communication services. Not included are, for example, pure corporate websites without direct consumer services or individually developed software for internal business purposes. In some cases, additional or deviating industry-specific requirements apply, such as in the health or education sectors, provided these already have their own accessibility regulations.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act represents a decisive step toward promoting digital accessibility in Germany. It specifically obligates private providers to design their digital products and services accessibly according to clearly defined technical standards, thereby enabling more comprehensive participation. Implementation requires a structured approach, the consideration of international standards, and the integration of accessible solutions into existing processes.
For companies, the law means addressing the requirements early on, clarifying internal responsibilities, and documenting the implementation in a verifiable manner. In doing so, transition periods, industry-specific exemptions, as well as the continuous review and adaptation of digital services must be taken into account. Compliance with these specifications is not only a legal obligation, but also offers the opportunity to make digital services future-proof and inclusive.
Check your homepage with the AccessGO quick check.
Identify risks and barriers according to WCAG standards.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act (BFSG) is directed at private providers of digital products and services, whereas the BITV 2.0 applies to public sector bodies. The obligations of the BFSG primarily affect e-commerce, online banking, and digital consumer services, while the BITV 2.0 regulates the accessibility of public websites and applications. Technically,both are based on the WCAG, but they differ in their legal target audience and scope of application.
The Accessibility Strengthening Act (BFSG) is directed at private providers of digital products and services, whereas the BITV 2.0 applies to public sector bodies. The obligations of the BFSG primarily affect e-commerce, online banking, and digital consumer services, while the BITV 2.0 regulates the accessibility of public websites and applications. Technically,both are based on the WCAG, but they differ in their legal target audience and scope of application.
In the event of violations of the Accessibility Strengthening Act, market surveillance authorities can impose measures such as formal complaints, rectification orders, or fines. The process typically begins with an audit and a request to remedy the deficiencies. If a provider fails to comply with the specifications, further sanctions may follow. The precise handling depends on the individual case and the nature of the established violation.
International standards such as the WCAG form the technical foundation for the requirements of the Accessibility Strengthening Act. Companies must verify and document compliance with these standards—for example, through audit reports, test protocols, or an accessibility self-declaration. Such supporting documents are part of internal processes and serve as proof of the implementation of statutory requirements.
Companies can document compliance with the Accessibility Strengthening Act by preparing evidence such as audit reports, test protocols, and accessibility self-declarations. The integration of international standards, particularly the WCAG and EN 301 549, is central to the technical implementation. For practical application, a combination of automated testing, manual reviews, and continuous documentation of measures is recommended.
