Are you from the public sector?

What the Federal Monitoring Body for Accessibility of Information Technology Provides

Table of Contents

Test the complete functionality of AccessGO risk-free for 7 days free of charge.

Authors
Picture of Frank Scheibe
Frank Scheibe
Experte für Barrierefreiheit

Key Points

The Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology is a central authority for monitoring and promoting digital accessibility in Germany. It audits whether businesses and public bodies meet legal requirements—particularly under the BFSG—and thus contributes significantly to making digital services accessible to all people.

As an independent BFSG authority, the Federal Monitoring Body for Accessibility develops systematic audit procedures, evaluates implementation status, and supports compliance with binding standards. For businesses and public institutions, this means guidance, support, and clear requirements for implementing accessible information technology. Typical challenges and sources of error are identified to enable sustainable improvements in the overall system.

The Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology is established as a central BFSG authority within the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS). It is organizationally independent but works closely with other authorities and institutions to coordinate the implementation of digital accessibility in Germany. Its primary responsibility lies in monitoring, evaluating, and promoting the accessibility of information technology in the public and private sectors.

Within its areas of responsibility, the Monitoring Body conducts audits of websites and mobile applications, prepares reports, and develops recommendations for improving accessibility. It acts as an interface between the federal government, the states, and other relevant bodies to ensure compliance with legal requirements under the BFSG. The body was established as part of the implementation of European accessibility directives and has since continuously evolved to meet current requirements.

Structural element Description
Organizational integration Established within BMAS, independent authority with federal jurisdiction
Interfaces Cooperation with state authorities, IT service providers, and European institutions
Main responsibilities Monitoring, auditing, reporting, and consulting on digital accessibility
History Founded as part of the implementation of European accessibility directives, continuous development
  • Central BFSG authority based at BMAS
  • Federal jurisdiction for digital accessibility
  • Close cooperation with other authorities and institutions
  • Developed from European accessibility legislation
  • Structured audit and consulting responsibilities

The Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology pursues the goal of enabling digital participation for all people. Its actions are guided by the core principles of transparency, objectivity, and the promotion of sustainable improvements. The guiding principles of the Monitoring Body are designed to eliminate barriers and consistently support the implementation of legal requirements for digital accessibility.

At the center of its responsibilities are monitoring compliance with accessibility requirements, advising businesses and public bodies, and continuously monitoring developments. Unlike other institutions that operate at the state level or set technical standards, the Monitoring Body focuses on federal-level monitoring and the systematic support of implementation. In doing so, it contributes significantly to promoting and advancing digital accessibility in Germany.

  • Focus on transparency, objectivity, and sustainable improvements
  • Core responsibilities: monitoring, consulting, and oversight
  • Distinction from state-level bodies and standardization committees
  • Central importance for promoting digital accessibility

Implement accessibility in a structured and legally compliant manner

7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.

For evaluating digital accessibility, the Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology applies binding standards. Central to these are the requirements according to WCAG 2.1 at Level AA, the provisions of BITV 2.0, and the specific regulations of the BFSG. These standards form the framework for developing detailed criteria catalogs, against which websites and applications are systematically audited.

The weighting of individual success criteria is based on their impact on the accessibility and usability of digital services. Essential aspects such as perceivability, operability, understandability, and robustness are given particular consideration. The audit criteria are regularly updated to incorporate technological developments and new legal requirements.

Success criterion Evaluation basis
Perceivability WCAG 2.1 AA, BITV 2.0, focus on text alternatives and contrast
Operability WCAG 2.1 AA, BFSG, navigation and keyboard accessibility
Understandability WCAG 2.1 AA, BITV 2.0, clear structures and understandable content
Robustness WCAG 2.1 AA, technical compatibility with assistive technologies
  • Evaluation based on WCAG 2.1 AA, BITV 2.0, and BFSG
  • Criteria catalogs define specific audit points
  • Weighting based on relevance to user groups
  • Regular updates to evaluation standards
  • Systematic and transparent evaluation by the Monitoring Body

The audit procedure of the Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology follows a clearly structured process. First, the selection of websites and applications to be audited is conducted using a risk-based approach, taking into account both random sampling and information from complaint management. The actual audit logic comprises a combination of automated tests and manual audits to comprehensively evaluate compliance with the relevant accessibility criteria.

Following the audit, the results are documented in detail and communicated to the responsible bodies. Follow-up on measures and verification of the implementation of corrections are integral parts of the procedure. The Monitoring Body places particular emphasis on transparency and traceability to ensure continuous improvement of digital accessibility.

Audit step Characteristics and distinctions
Selection of audit objects Risk-based, random sampling, consideration of complaints
Audit methodology Combination of automated tools and manual audits
Documentation Detailed reports, structured feedback to responsible parties
Follow-up Monitoring implementation of recommended measures, repeat audits as needed
  • Audit procedure based on risk-based selection and complaints
  • Audit logic combines automated and manual audit methods
  • Documentation and follow-up ensure sustainable improvements
  • Transparency and traceability are the focus

Uncertain about legal requirements?

Schedule a free consultation and speak with one of our experts.

Implement accessibility in a structured and legally compliant manner

7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.

Conclusion

Die Überwachungsstelle des Bundes für Barrierefreiheit von Informationstechnik nimmt eine zentrale Rolle bei der Kontrolle und Förderung digitaler Barrierefreiheit in Deutschland ein. Sie überwacht die Einhaltung gesetzlicher Vorgaben, entwickelt Prüfverfahren weiter und arbeitet eng mit anderen Behörden sowie europäischen Institutionen zusammen. Unternehmen und öffentliche Stellen profitieren von klaren Vorgaben, praxisnahen Empfehlungen und einer strukturierten Begleitung bei der Umsetzung von Barrierefreiheitsanforderungen.

The Federal Monitoring Body operates as a specialized BFSG authority with clearly defined responsibilities. It ensures transparency, provides various reporting channels, and supports the sustainable improvement of digital services. Through continuous adaptation to technological and legal developments, it contributes significantly to the advancement of digital participation.

  • Central authority for monitoring and promoting digital accessibility
  • Clear audit procedures, transparent communication, and practical recommendations
  • Continuous adaptation to legal and technological developments

Accessibility Check: How accessible is your homepage?

Check your homepage with the AccessGO quick check.
Identify risks and barriers according to WCAG standards.

The most important questions and answers.

Audits conducted by the Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology are generally subject to fixed deadlines: Completion of an audit typically takes several weeks. Responses and statements from the audited bodies are often required within two to four weeks. In complex cases or where extensive remediation is needed, individual deadline extensions may be granted to allow for thorough processing.

Audits conducted by the Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology are generally subject to fixed deadlines: Completion of an audit typically takes several weeks. Responses and statements from the audited bodies are often required within two to four weeks. In complex cases or where extensive remediation is needed, individual deadline extensions may be granted to allow for thorough processing.

When deficiencies are identified during an audit by the Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology, the affected bodies are requested to implement remediation. If timely correction does not occur, the Monitoring Body may initiate further measures, such as publishing the deficiencies or referring the matter to the relevant supervisory authorities. Escalation occurs in stages and is based on the scope and severity of the identified violations.

The Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology contributes to the development of standards by collecting and systematically evaluating practical experience from audits. The selection of websites and applications to be audited is conducted both through random sampling and on an event-driven basis, such as following complaints. Insights from these audits feed into the adaptation and refinement of accessibility standards.

The Federal Monitoring Body for the Accessibility of Information Technology actively participates in national and international committees, contributing practical experience from the monitoring of audit objects. In doing so, it influences the adaptation of audit criteria and promotes the harmonization of standards. The selection of audit objects follows established criteria and contributes to the development of uniform evaluation standards.

Questions about digital accessibility? We're here to help.

accessgo-photo-experts-3x
Talk to our AccessGO experts
We provide competent advice on all your questions.
or

AccessGO Plugin in Aktion

per Klick oder Tastatur ALT + 1