Are you from the public sector?
Are you from the public sector?
Test the complete functionality of AccessGO risk-free for 7 days free of charge.
Checking PDF accessibility in a targeted and systematic way is crucial for digital inclusion and compliance with legal requirements. This guide shows you how to check PDF accessibility—from selecting suitable testing methods and using specialized tools to evaluation against recognized standards such as WCAG and PDF/UA.
You will receive practical guidance on the most important testing steps, learn how typical errors can be avoided, and understand the importance of combining automated and manual testing. In addition, it explains how to meet regulatory requirements and how to document evidence of the accessibility of your PDFs in a structured way.
Testing PDF accessibility follows a clear methodology that includes both structured processes and different testing methods. The goal is to assess the accessibility of a document for all user groups in a transparent way. The process begins with preparing and reviewing the document, followed by selecting suitable testing tools and carrying out automated and manual checks. Finally, the results are evaluated and the identified barriers are documented.
Automated checks enable rapid capture of technical aspects, such as verifying tags or alternative text. Manual checks are necessary to assess more complex requirements such as content clarity or logical reading order. Combining both methods ensures a comprehensive assessment of PDF accessibility and forms the basis for targeted remediation.
| Test step | Description and objective |
|---|---|
| Preparation and review | Analysis of the source document, definition of test objectives, and selection of testing tools |
| Automated testing | Machine-based capture of technical criteria such as tags, structural elements, and alternative text |
| Manual testing | Review of complex criteria such as reading order, clarity, and usability |
| Evaluation and documentation | Summary of results, identification of barriers, and derivation of measures |
Accessibility testing of PDFs is based on clearly defined principles derived from international standards such as WCAG and PDF/UA. These standards require, among other things, that content is accessible and understandable for all user groups. Key requirements include a clear document structure, correct reading order, and complete tagging of all relevant content. Metadata such as title and language also play an important role, as they further improve accessibility and findability.
Unlike general web accessibility testing, PDFs focus on specific aspects. While websites are often dynamic, PDFs must have a fixed, logically structured outline. Reading order is not automatic and must be explicitly defined. Correct tagging of headings, lists, and tables is also essential for accessible PDFs.
7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.
To reliably assess PDF accessibility, key test criteria based on WCAG and PDF/UA are used. These criteria include aspects such as correct tagging of headings, alternative text for images, a traceable reading order, and the use of accessible form fields. Compliance with these requirements is checked systematically and documented in test reports.
Rating systems often use graduated scales, for example based on the principle of “met,” “partially met,” or “not met.” Individual criteria may be weighted differently depending on their importance to reflect their impact on the overall accessibility score. Structured documentation of the results enables targeted remediation and creates transparency in the audit process.
| Success criterion | Assessment and weighting |
|---|---|
| Alternative text for images | Met / Partially met / Not met (high weighting) |
| Structured headings | Met / Partially met / Not met (medium weighting) |
| Reading order | Met / Partially met / Not met (high weighting) |
| Accessible form fields | Met / Partially met / Not met (medium weighting) |
A complete PDF accessibility check is carried out in several steps to ensure a systematic process. First, the document is examined for technical criteria using suitable testing software. These tools automatically detect many structural and semantic errors and provide an initial assessment. The next step involves manual checks, focusing in particular on logical reading order, content clarity, and usability for users of assistive technologies.
The results of automated and manual testing are documented in a test report. This documentation is essential to ensure the traceability of the assessment and to derive targeted improvements. Combining both testing methods increases the audit’s validity and ensures a comprehensive evaluation of accessibility.
| Testing software | Manual testing |
|---|---|
| Rapid detection of technical errors | Assessment of complex content and structures |
| Standardized test criteria, automated evaluation | Individual review of readability and usability |
| Limited to machine-detectable aspects | Complemented by human judgment and experience |
Numerous tools are available for checking PDF accessibility, offering varying focuses and features. Established solutions include PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker), axesPDF, and Adobe Acrobat, which automatically check both technical and structural aspects. While desktop applications like PAC enable local analysis, online tools offer the advantage of quick, location-independent use without installation.
The selection of a suitable testing tool depends on various criteria, including scope of functions, ease of use, compatibility with common standards, and the ability to export test reports. Online solutions are particularly suitable for spontaneous individual checks, while desktop programs often offer more detailed analyses and greater customization options.
| Tool/Software | Features and Special Characteristics |
|---|---|
| PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker) | Free, desktop application, comprehensive WCAG/PDF/UA testing, detailed reports |
| axesPDF | Advanced testing and editing functions, desktop solution, integration into workflows |
| Adobe Acrobat | Commercial, widely used, offers testing and correction functions, PDF standard support |
| Online Checkers (e.g., PDFGo, PDF Accessibility Checker Online) | Quick check without installation, usually limited functionality, browser-based |
Schedule a free consultation and speak with one of our experts.
The practical testing of PDF accessibility can be carried out efficiently using a clear step-by-step approach. First, the PDF document is analysed with a suitable tool to identify technical and structural issues. This is followed by targeted manual checks of the reading order, alternative text, and overall content clarity. After the initial review, necessary corrections are made to the document, followed by a re-evaluation to confirm the effectiveness of the improvements.
Integrating accessibility testing into existing workflows is relevant in many sectors, such as public administration, education, and corporate communications. Practical examples show that regular testing and documentation of results lead to a sustainable improvement in PDF quality. Iterative correction and re-testing are key components of a successful review process.
Accessible PDFs are subject to clearly defined legal requirements arising from the Accessibility Strengthening Act (BFSG), the Barrier-Free Information Technology Ordinance (BITV 2.0), and the international WCAG guidelines. These regulations oblige public sector bodies in particular, and increasingly also companies, to provide digital content in a way that is accessible to all user groups. The requirements cover both the technical implementation and the content design of PDF documents.
In contrast to other document types such as Office files or websites, PDFs are subject to specific regulations that take into account their fixed structure and common use cases. Compliance with these requirements is a key component of digital accessibility and is regularly assessed as part of audits and monitoring processes. For companies and public authorities, this means that the creation and review of accessible PDFs should be an integral part of their digital strategy.
When testing PDF accessibility, recurring challenges often arise that can be both technical and organizational in nature. Common sources of errors include missing or incorrect tag structures, insufficient alternative text, and an unclear reading order. The testing and optimisation of tables, forms, and multi-column layouts are particularly complex, as these elements have specific requirements regarding proper tagging and usability.
Organizational challenges, such as unclear responsibilities or poorly defined workflows, can also hinder the sustainable implementation of accessible PDFs. To avoid recurring errors, it is advisable to establish clearly defined processes, provide regular training, and consistently use specialised testing tools. Integrating accessibility requirements early in the document creation process significantly contributes to preventing mistakes.
| Source of Error | Solution Approach |
|---|---|
| Missing tag structure | Automated and manual re-checking, structured document creation |
| Incomplete alternative texts | Clear responsibilities, checklists for image descriptions |
| Complex tables and forms | Specialized tools, targeted training for responsible persons |
| Unclear workflows in the team | Binding processes, regular communication and documentation |
7 days unrestricted access. No payment details required.
Automated testing tools are an important component in assessing PDF accessibility. They reliably detect technical issues such as missing tags, incorrect structural elements, or absent alternative text. However, these tools reach their limits when it comes to evaluating content clarity, logical reading order, or the correct handling of complex elements such as tables and forms. In these cases, human judgment and experience are essential.
Manual reviews complement automated analysis and focus on aspects that can only be assessed through individual evaluation. These include checking the meaningfulness of alternative text, readability from a user’s perspective, and usability with assistive technologies. Combining both approaches is recommended, as it enables a more comprehensive and practice-oriented assessment.
| Automated Testing | Manual Testing |
|---|---|
| Detects technical errors and missing structural elements | Evaluates reading order and content comprehensibility |
| Fast analysis of large document volumes | Checks the meaningfulness of alternative texts and user-friendliness |
| Limited to machine-detectable criteria | Identifies individual and complex barriers |
Complex elements such as tables and forms are particularly critical when checking PDF accessibility. Errors in structuring and field tagging are common here. Alternative text for images and graphics is also a key problem area, as it is often missing or insufficient. Nested lists, multi-column layouts, and interactive elements also require special attention, as they are often not made properly accessible for assistive technologies.
Systematically checking PDF accessibility is a key building block for digital inclusion and for meeting legal requirements. A targeted combination of automated tools and manual checks makes it possible to reliably identify and remove both technical and content-related barriers. Choosing suitable testing methods, structured documentation, and integration into existing workflows are crucial for sustainable results.
For companies and public bodies, it is important to consider relevant standards such as WCAG and PDF/UA and to deliberately avoid typical sources of error. Practical implementation—from selecting tools to remediation—creates transparency and supports continuous improvement of the accessibility of PDF documents.
Check your homepage with the AccessGO quick check.
Identify risks and barriers according to WCAG standards.
PDF/UA is specifically designed for the accessibility of PDF documents and defines detailed requirements for structure, tagging, and technical implementation. WCAG, by contrast, is a general standard for web content and addresses accessibility regardless of file type.
PDF/UA is specifically designed for the accessibility of PDF documents and defines detailed requirements for structure, tagging, and technical implementation. WCAG, by contrast, is a general standard for web content and addresses accessibility regardless of file type.
Metadata such as title, language, and bookmarks are crucial for PDF accessibility. They enable users and assistive technologies to identify, navigate, and correctly interpret the document more easily.
For large volumes of PDF documents, automated testing and remediation tools are particularly suitable. They enable rapid analysis of technical accessibility criteria and can fix simple errors across multiple files at the same time. Limitations arise with complex content, which still needs to be checked manually.
The accessibility of existing PDFs can be improved efficiently by using batch tools and automated workflows. With these solutions, numerous files can be checked simultaneously for typical errors and basic corrections can be applied. For more complex adjustments, targeted rework of individual documents is recommended.
